Updated daily · Arena + Artificial Analysis
Decks, Screenshots & Documents
Reading dashboards and campaign screenshots, parsing PDFs and contracts, pulling data out of decks and one-pagers.
One board from The GTM Model Leaderboard
Quick answer
For Decks, Screenshots & Documents, Anthropic's Claude Fable 5 (High) leads at 1310 Vision Elo on the Arena Vision + Document leaderboards, ahead of Qwen 3.8 (Max). DemandLab recaptures this board daily; these numbers are from September 23, 2026. Rankings are job-specific, so the winner here is not the winner on the other seven boards.
Compiled by Chris Arden, Fractional CMO, DemandLab · Updated on
Decks, Screenshots & Documents Leaderboard
Reading dashboards and campaign screenshots, parsing PDFs and contracts, pulling data out of decks and one-pagers.
- 1Claude Fable 5 (High)AnthropicOutside the Document top 51310±8Vision Elo
- 2Qwen 3.8 (Max)AlibabaMoved up from #3 to #2; outside the Document top 51302±8Vision Elo
- 3Claude Opus 4.7 (High)AnthropicOutside the Document top 51301±7Vision Elo
- 4Claude Opus 4.7AnthropicOutside the Document top 51300±7Vision Elo
- 5Claude Opus 4.6 (High)Anthropic#3 Document (1507)1299±7Vision Elo
Operator take · The Vision and Document boards held from last capture. On Vision, Fable 5 High still leads at 1310, with Qwen 3.8 Max (1302), Opus 4.7 High (1301), Opus 4.7 (1300) and Opus 4.6 High (1299) all within a few points, so the order below #1 is noise. On Document, Claude Opus 5 High leads at 1516, Claude Fable 5.1 Max is second at 1513, Opus 4.6 High and Opus 4.6 tie at 1507, and Fable 5 High is fifth at 1496. Practical read is unchanged: screenshots and charts go to Fable 5, and contracts and multi-page PDFs go to Opus 5 High.
Updated daily from the linked public leaderboards; last capture September 23, 2026. Elo and win-rate figures are preference-based measures, not task-completion guarantees. Always validate the top pick on your own representative work before routing production volume to it.
How to Read These Rankings
Four rules before you switch models
- Every ranking is task-specific. The #1 agent model is not the #1 writer, and neither is the right pick for 10,000 Clay rows.
- Scores come from public leaderboards (Arena, Artificial Analysis) with capture dates shown. Preference Elo measures which output people like, not whether work gets completed.
- Reasoning effort and harness matter: the same model at a different effort tier or in a different agent harness ranks differently.
- Cheap plus fast beats frontier for volume work. Route by job, not by brand loyalty.
Frequently Asked Questions
Decks, Screenshots & Documents: common questions
Which AI model is best for Decks, Screenshots & Documents?
As of September 23, 2026, Claude Fable 5 (High) from Anthropic ranks first for Decks, Screenshots & Documents at 1310 Vision Elo (±8) on the Arena Vision + Document leaderboards. Qwen 3.8 (Max) ranks second at 1302, and Claude Opus 4.7 (High) third at 1301. DemandLab recaptures the board daily, so check the date above before quoting a position.
Where do these AI model rankings come from?
Decks, Screenshots & Documents is scored from the Arena Vision + Document leaderboards (https://arena.ai/leaderboard), measured by Vision Elo. DemandLab captures the public results, maps them to the go-to-market job they apply to, and publishes them unmodified. No scores are estimated, blended, or adjusted, and any board that cannot be read on a given day is left unchanged rather than guessed.
How often is the GTM Model Leaderboard updated?
Daily. The last capture was September 23, 2026. Model leaderboards move faster than most buying cycles, and positions inside a confidence interval can flip overnight, so DemandLab treats a single day's order as one observation rather than a trend.
Should I switch to the top-ranked model?
Not automatically. The Vision and Document boards held from last capture. On Vision, Fable 5 High still leads at 1310, with Qwen 3.8 Max (1302), Opus 4.7 High (1301), Opus 4.7 (1300) and Opus 4.6 High (1299) all within a few points, so the order below #1 is noise. On Document, Claude Opus 5 High leads at 1516, Claude Fable 5.1 Max is second at 1513, Opus 4.6 High and Opus 4.6 tie at 1507, and Fable 5 High is fifth at 1496. Practical read is unchanged: screenshots and charts go to Fable 5, and contracts and multi-page PDFs go to Opus 5 High.
DemandLab routes these models inside production GTM systems every day. If you want help picking and wiring the right models into your own stack, that's what DemandLab does.