Updated daily · Arena + Artificial Analysis
Decks, Screenshots & Documents
Reading dashboards and campaign screenshots, parsing PDFs and contracts, pulling data out of decks and one-pagers.
One board from The GTM Model Leaderboard
Decks, Screenshots & Documents Leaderboard
Reading dashboards and campaign screenshots, parsing PDFs and contracts, pulling data out of decks and one-pagers.
- 1Claude Fable 5Anthropic#4 Document (1504)1318±9Vision Elo
- 2Claude Opus 4.7 (Thinking)Anthropic1304±7Vision Elo
- 3Gemini 3.6 FlashGoogleWide error bars, still few votes1301±38Vision Elo
- 4Claude Opus 4.6 (Thinking)Anthropic#3 Document (1506)1300±7Vision Elo
- 5Claude Opus 5 (High)Anthropic#1 Document (1520)1299±14Vision Elo
Operator take · If your workflow reads Dripify screenshots, HubSpot dashboards, or client PDFs, this category is your bottleneck. Opus 5 took the top of the Document arena this week, and Gemini 3.6 Flash broke Claude's Vision sweep at #3, though on thin volume so far. Fable 5 still leads Vision.
Updated daily from the linked public leaderboards; last capture Jul 27, 2026. Elo and win-rate figures are preference-based measures, not task-completion guarantees. Always validate the top pick on your own representative work before routing production volume to it.
How to Read These Rankings
Four rules before you switch models
- Every ranking is task-specific. The #1 agent model is not the #1 writer, and neither is the right pick for 10,000 Clay rows.
- Scores come from public leaderboards (Arena, Artificial Analysis) with capture dates shown. Preference Elo measures which output people like, not whether work gets completed.
- Reasoning effort and harness matter: the same model at a different effort tier or in a different agent harness ranks differently.
- Cheap plus fast beats frontier for volume work. Route by job, not by brand loyalty.
We route these models inside production GTM systems every day. If you want help picking and wiring the right models into your own stack, that's what we do.