Updated daily · Arena + Artificial Analysis
Prospect & Market Research
Account research, funding-signal digests, competitive intel, pre-call briefs. Needs live web search plus defensible citations.
One board from The GTM Model Leaderboard
Prospect & Market Research Leaderboard
Account research, funding-signal digests, competitive intel, pre-call briefs. Needs live web search plus defensible citations.
- 1Claude Opus 4.6 (Search)Anthropic1253±5Arena Elo
- 2GPT-5.5 (Search)OpenAI1240±5Arena Elo
- 3Claude Fable 5Anthropic1237±8Arena Elo
- 4Claude Opus 4.7Anthropic1233±5Arena Elo
- 5Ernie 5.1Baidu1226±10Arena Elo
Operator take · Search-grounded ranking, not raw model IQ. For account research the gap between #1 and #4 is small; pick based on the tool you already run (Claude in Claude Code/Cowork, GPT in ChatGPT) rather than switching stacks for 20 Elo.
Updated daily from the linked public leaderboards; last capture Jul 27, 2026. Elo and win-rate figures are preference-based measures, not task-completion guarantees. Always validate the top pick on your own representative work before routing production volume to it.
How to Read These Rankings
Four rules before you switch models
- Every ranking is task-specific. The #1 agent model is not the #1 writer, and neither is the right pick for 10,000 Clay rows.
- Scores come from public leaderboards (Arena, Artificial Analysis) with capture dates shown. Preference Elo measures which output people like, not whether work gets completed.
- Reasoning effort and harness matter: the same model at a different effort tier or in a different agent harness ranks differently.
- Cheap plus fast beats frontier for volume work. Route by job, not by brand loyalty.
We route these models inside production GTM systems every day. If you want help picking and wiring the right models into your own stack, that's what we do.