Updated daily · Arena + Artificial Analysis
GTM Engineering & Landing Pages
Building automations, Clay integrations, webhooks, prospect landing pages, internal tools. The builder work behind every AI GTM system.
One board from The GTM Model Leaderboard
GTM Engineering & Landing Pages Leaderboard
Building automations, Clay integrations, webhooks, prospect landing pages, internal tools. The builder work behind every AI GTM system.
- 1Kimi K3Moonshot AI1682±13Arena Elo
- 2Claude Opus 5 (High)Anthropic1673±14Arena Elo
- 3Claude Fable 5Anthropic1629±10Arena Elo
- 4GPT-5.6 Sol (xHigh)OpenAI1625±10Arena Elo
- 5GLM-5.2 (Max)Zhipu (GLM)1587±9Arena Elo
Operator take · The one frontier category where open-weight models genuinely lead: Kimi K3 still tops WebDev and GLM-5.2 holds a top-5 slot. Opus 5 entered at #2 this week and its error bars overlap Kimi's, so treat the top two as a tie and pick on the harness you already build in.
Updated daily from the linked public leaderboards; last capture Jul 27, 2026. Elo and win-rate figures are preference-based measures, not task-completion guarantees. Always validate the top pick on your own representative work before routing production volume to it.
How to Read These Rankings
Four rules before you switch models
- Every ranking is task-specific. The #1 agent model is not the #1 writer, and neither is the right pick for 10,000 Clay rows.
- Scores come from public leaderboards (Arena, Artificial Analysis) with capture dates shown. Preference Elo measures which output people like, not whether work gets completed.
- Reasoning effort and harness matter: the same model at a different effort tier or in a different agent harness ranks differently.
- Cheap plus fast beats frontier for volume work. Route by job, not by brand loyalty.
We route these models inside production GTM systems every day. If you want help picking and wiring the right models into your own stack, that's what we do.